Note: This message is displayed if (1) your browser is not standards-compliant or (2) you have you disabled CSS. Read our Policies for more information.
This publication is an overview of the Councils stance on leadership, health care, education, employment, transportation, community supports for children and adults, and legal justice issues for people with disabilities.
To download this document in PDF format, click here.
POLICY STATEMENT
People with disabilities and their family members are leaders in all aspects of society including in their personal lives, their communities, and at the state and national levels.
BELIEFS AND CONDITIONS
Government by the people includes citizens with disabilities and their families. Citizens with disabilities and their families desire to actively participate in decision making processes that affect their lives. Services and programs supporting people with disabilities are more successful when those being served have the opportunity to participate in the program’s governance. There is an increasing effort by some boards, councils and programs to include people with disabilities in leadership roles. Regardless of disability, people strive for and achieve leadership positions that influence all aspects of society, government, and business.
POSITION
The Council supports legislation, policy, and practices that:
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Leadership: The process of social influence in which one person can enlist the aid and support of others in the accomplishment of a common task.
Evidence based governance: The development of policy, rules and regulations in which the underlying rationale is based upon evidence of statistically significant effectiveness through empirical research.
REFERENCES
Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-402, 114 Stat. 1677 (2000).
POLICY STATEMENT
Quality, affordable, accessible health care that meets the needs and choices of people with disabilities and chronic conditions, including home and community-based alternatives in long term care, is an essential ingredient for participating fully in all aspects of life.
BELIEFS AND CONDITIONS
The measures and rewards used for evaluating quality health care should be aligned with health care outcomes. A test of an effective health care system is how well it serves people with disabilities and chronic conditions. A quality health care system focuses on wellness and includes a comprehensive array of services that addresses prevention, health, mental health, dental, vision, hearing, nutrition, rehabilitation, and other specialty needs, delivered through a primary care, medical home model. Many people, including people with disabilities, are uninsured or underinsured. People with disabilities often cannot access health care services and facilities that match their specific needs or are denied services to maintain their health status. Many people are forced to use costly emergency room services as their primary health care resource. People with disabilities often face discriminatory practices due to denial for coverage of pre-existing conditions, the use of confusing and complicated automated communication technologies, the complexity of application for eligibility process, denial for ongoing and specialized services, and complicated billing and explanation of benefits. Health care providers have a lack of knowledge and expertise regarding the health care needs of people with disabilities. People with disabilities often have multiple providers and experience a lack of communication and coordination which potentially jeopardizes quality care.
POSITION
The Council supports legislation, policy, and practices that:
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Medical home: An approach to providing comprehensive primary care that facilitates partnerships between individual patients, and their personal physicians, and when appropriate, the patient’s family.
Medicaid Waiver: The source of combined federal and state funding for services available to clients who are eligible for Medicaid but choose to remain in the community.
REFERENCES
Families USA, “Americans At Risk: One in Three Uninsured,” (2009), available at http://www.familiesusa.org/assets/pdfs/americans-at-risk.pdf
POLICY STATEMENT
People with disabilities have access to education and life-long learning opportunities with choices, options and supports in integrated school and community settings.
BELIEFS AND CONDITIONS
People with disabilities, like other citizens, are life-long learners. All students, including those with disabilities, require quality educational experiences in order to reach their life goals. Students with disabilities learn best in integrated settings in their neighborhood schools. Federal law mandates that the educational system serves students in response to their individual educational needs in the least restrictive environment. Students with disabilities often leave school without the skills, experiences and supports they need to live, learn, work and play as valued citizens in their communities. A high proportion of students with disabilities do not graduate high school or pursue higher education.
POSITION
The Council supports legislation, policy, and practices that:
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Least Restrictive Environment: The position that a student who has a disability should have the opportunity to be educated with non-disabled peers, to the greatest extent possible.
Transition: Services provided for students with disabilities to help make the transition from school to adulthood.
Parent Training and Information Centers: Federally funded centers that serve families of children of all ages with all disabilities; physical, cognitive, behavioral, social, and emotional.
Positive Behavior Supports (PBS): Considers what is important to the person and for the person and implements those values into a comprehensive plan to address challenging behavior. PBS focuses on valued outcomes such as teaching or strengthening skills, enhancing relationships, and increasing participation in the community.
REFERENCES
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
Improving Head Start for School Readiness Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-134, 121 Stat. 1393 (2007).
U.S. Department of Education. High School Dropout and Completion Rates in the United States: 2007 (IES 2009-064). Washington: GPO, 2009.
POLICY STATEMENT
People with disabilities are employed with fair and equitable wages and benefits, with access to a variety of employment options and upward mobility, and with access to appropriate accommodations and supports.
BELIEFS AND CONDITIONS
People with disabilities want economic self sufficiency in order to fully participate in the community. They possess skills that match business and community needs. People with disabilities are underemployed or unemployed at a disproportionately high rate compared to other Hoosiers. People with disabilities are more likely to be impoverished.
POSITION
The Council supports legislation, policy, and practices that:
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Vocational Rehabilitation: Services offered to individuals with cognitive or developmental disabilities that are designed to enable participants to attain skills, resources, attitudes, and expectations needed to obtain and retain employment.
School-to-Work: Programs that provide ways for students to transition successfully into the economy.
REFERENCES
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990)
Cornell University. Online Resource for Disability Statistics. Disability Statistics [Data File]. Retrieved from http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/edi/DisabilityStatistics
Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 7
Workforce Investment Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-220, 112 Stat. 936 (1998)
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/Lau
POLICY STATEMENT
Freedom of movement is essential for independent living, for engaging in productive self-sustaining activities, and, most importantly, for full participation in the communities of one’s choice.
BELIEFS AND CONDITIONS
People with disabilities, like other Indiana citizens, deserve viable options for getting from place to place to live, work and play in their community of choice. All components of a transportation system must meet the needs of all citizens in an accessible and affordable manner. Although some improvements have occurred significant barriers remain. Most Indiana counties are rural and lack accessible, affordable and timely transportation resources. While some urban communities have more transportation options, challenges with accessible, affordable and timely resources remain. Existing systems have restricted hours and days of service options, and lack adequate basic infrastructure including accessible sidewalks and bus stops. Transportation options for traveling from city to city are extremely limited, costly, and difficult to navigate and require unusually long commute times.
POSITION
The Council supports legislation, policy, and practices that:
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Intermodal: The combination of more than one mode of transportation.
Green technology: The application of environmental science to conserve the natural environment and resources, and to curb the negative impacts of human involvement.
REFERENCES
Indiana Institute on Disability (2010). [Disability Transportation Survey].Unpublished raw data.
POLICY STATEMENT
People with disabilities are full participants in their communities based on their desires and choices.
BELIEFS AND CONDITIONS
People with disabilities report their lives are better when they live in their own homes and in communities of their choosing. When supports are needed, people with disabilities prefer a wide array of options in the type, location and provider of services and supports that best meet their needs and desires. However, needed services are often cost prohibitive or simply unavailable. Available public resources are biased to institutional and facility-based care limiting choices to achieve full participation in their community. As a result many people with disabilities and their families are forced to accept unsatisfactory living conditions and to wait years for alternative options. Current community capacity to meet the increasing needs of people with disabilities who desire to live in their communities including those on waiting lists, those living with aging parents and those living in institutions is inadequate. Needed services and supports include, and are not limited to, personal attendant care, housing, transportation, community mental health, health care, recreation, employment, and spiritual.P
POSITION
The Council supports legislation, policy, and practices that:
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Assistive technology: The use of technology to meet the needs of people with disabilities in all areas of life: education, employment, transportation and community living activities.
Medicaid Waiver: The source of combined federal and state funding for services available to clients who are eligible for Medicaid but choose to remain in the community.
REFERENCES
Braddock, D., Hemp, R. (2008). Establishing A Tradition Of Commitment: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Services in Indiana. Available at http://www.in.gov/gpcpd/2404.htm
Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Medicaid Home and Community-Based Service Programs: Data Update (Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission, November 2009).
Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Medicaid Facts: State Fiscal Conditions and Medicaid (Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission, November 2008).
POLICY STATEMENT
People with disabilities are treated equally, fairly, respectfully, and consistently at all levels in the legal/justice system.
BELIEFS AND CONDITIONS
People with disabilities are law abiding citizens and appreciate safe communities. The treatment of people with disabilities in the Indiana legal/justice system has improved over the past decade. However people with disabilities face greater challenges with the legal system because they frequently have physical and behavioral issues with a lack of services to address their needs. Funding streams do not address dual diagnoses (mental health and developmental disabilities), especially for people in the legal/justice system. People with developmental disabilities charged with crimes can be subject to criminal laws predicated on the assumption that the person charged can be “restored” to competency to stand trial. There remain persistent concerns that incarcerated individuals do not have access to necessary medications to help them attain and retain competency.
POSITION
The Council supports legislation, policy, and practices that:
TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Dual diagnosis: A term that refers to individuals who have both a mental health and developmental disability.
Developmental Disabilities: Used to describe life-long disabilities occurring before age 22 attributable to a mental or physical impairment or a combination of both.
REFERENCES:
Indiana v. Davis, 898 N.E.2d 281, 287 (Ind. 2008)
Compton, Michael T, Masuma Bahora, Amy C. Watson, Janet R. Oliva. (2008). A Comprehensive Review of Extant Research on Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Programs. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36, 47-55.
Cowell, A., Broner, N. & Dupont, R. (2004).The cost-effectiveness of criminal justice diversion programs for people with serious mental illness co-occurring with substance abuse: Four Case Studies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 292-314.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990)
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241 (1964)
Indiana Civil Rights Law, Indiana Code § 22-9-1-2
Indiana v. Davis, 898 N.E.2d 281, 287 (Ind. 2008)