MATERIALS FROM THE 2008 SPRING JUDICIAL COLLEGE PROGRAM
The Role of Judicial Officers in Managing Juvenile Sex Offense Cases
Session Presentation 
41 pages | 4.1 mb
Materials developed by the Center for Effective Public Policy through a
project sponsored by the State Justice Institute and presented by Deanne
Darling, 5th Judicial District, Oregon and Senior Manager Representatives
from the Center for Effective Public Policy: Dr. Kurt Bumby and Thomas
Talbot. Faculty members explored the role of the judicial officer in
managing sex offenses committed by juveniles -- cases which are frequently
identified as challenging because of the complicated dynamics associated with juvenile sex offending behavior.
Courtroom Best Practices in Self-Represented Litigation
Session Presentation 
84 pages | 4.58 mb
Course curriculum focused attention on the application of the Code of
Judicial Conduct, advisory opinions and case law implicated in civil SRL
cases; different styles of engagement with litigants in the courtroom; the
development of strategies of engagement which promote access to justice
without being or seeming biased to participants; and the development of a
systems approach for clerks and court staff who deal with SRL's. Portions
of the curriculum were drawn from a model curriculum developed by the
National Judicial College, the National Center for State Courts, the
American Judicature Society and the Self-Represented Litigation Network on
courtroom best practices in self-represented litigation cases. Faculty
included John Greacen, Greacen Associates, New Mexico; Gregory Donat,Tippecanoe Superior Court; and Jane Spencer Craney, Morgan Superior Court.
Effective Sentencing - The Next Step: What Do You Do with What the
Research Tells You?
Session Presentation & Associated Documents 
188 pages | 2.73 mb
In this follow-up to the 2007 Spring Judicial College program on “Effective
Sentencing: What Does the Research Tell Us,” Mark Carey recapped the
growing body of research on evidence based practices describing what works
in reducing recidivism and then took the discussion on effective sentencing
to the next level. What should a judicial officer do with all this
research? How do you implement evidence based programs? What are other
jurisdictions doing? Can you simply copy another’s program? These and
many other issues were addressed during this day long program on effective
sentencing practices. Materials developed and presented by Mark Carey, The Carey Group, White Bear Lake, Minnesota.
Evidence in Action - A Practicum on the Rules of Evidence
Session Presentation 
48 pages | 4.5 mb
Materials prepared by William Hughes, Hamilton Superior Court. The trial seems to be progressing well, but suddenly the dreaded word “Objection” resounds in the courtroom. What rule applies? Was there a sufficient foundation? Is the tendered evidence probative? Is the evidence too prejudicial? How will I rule? In an interactive setting based on a civil case fact scenario, these and other questions will be addressed. In a judge’s world, evidence is both an academic discipline and a necessary skill. Join your colleagues in honing your evidence skills.
The Foreclosure Crisis in Indiana - The Judge's Role
Session Presentation 
44 pages | 1.57 mb
Indiana is in the top five states for foreclosure rates, and was second overall (behind Ohio) for the 3rd quarter of 2007. Foreclosure vests significant discretion in the judicial officer, which will tax the creativity of those hearing the cases. The need to encourage negotiated resolutions and alternatives to foreclosures is huge, not just for the affected homeowners, but also for their neighbors whose property values are declining, and for the world financial system that is holding its breath to see how many U.S. mortgages will end in default. Topics to be covered in this round table discussion include: the effect and interplay of bankruptcy on a foreclosure action; pro bono resources for pro se defendants; the structure of the mortgage industry and relationships of the parties; and the regulation of mortgage lenders in Indiana. Faculty: Professor Alan White, Valparaiso University School of Law; Michael Feiwell & Douglas Hannoy, Feiwell & Hannoy; Chris Jackson, Chris Jackson Law Office.
The Impact of Technology on the Courts, Including 4th Amendment Issues
Session Presentations 
102 pages | 2.6 mb
The search and seizure of computers and the ramifications of obtaining
electronic evidence will be addressed. Faculty will also examine the dimensions of “cyber crime,” the civil and criminal implications of computer forensics evidence, whether computer searches are “special,” and when the Fourth Amendment applies. Materials prepared by: Thomas Sadaka, Of-Counsel to Seiden Alder Matthewman & Bloch, Celebration, FL.
A Special Population with Special Rules: Adult Sex Offenders
Session Presentations 
102 pages | 2.3 mb
Materials submitted by Judge Mark Stoner, Marion Superior Court and Adam Deming Psy.D., Program Director, Sex Offender Management & Monitoring Program, Liberty Behavioral Health Corporation. This program on adult sex offenders was divided into three areas: a review of the special statutory provisions governing sex offenders currently in effect along with any new sex offender legislation; probation conditions and supervision of sex offenders; and, sex offender assessment tools and available treatment
programs. Christine Kerl, Supervising Probation Officer, Marion County Probation also participated as faculty.
|